top of page

No Adjudication of Paternity – Denied DNA Test,
No VAP, No Adjudication Order, Void ab initio,
Due
Process Violation

The statutory requirement to adjudicate paternity has never been met in my case. Under Kansas law, paternity can only be established by:
 

  1. A properly signed and filed Voluntary Acknowledgment of Paternity (VAP),

  2. Genetic/DNA testing confirming paternity, or

  3. A court-issued adjudication order formally declaring paternity.

 
None of these requirements were ever satisfied in my case. I never signed a VAP, I never took a DNA test, and no court has ever entered a valid adjudication order. Despite this, the Kansas Attorney General, Kansas DCF, and even federal courts have refused to acknowledge these facts. The Rush County court file contains no adjudication of paternity whatsoever, making every single order based on that file void ab initio (void from the beginning).
 
When I filed a motion and supplemental motion specifically addressing the lack of adjudication of paternity, the Rush County courts denied my due process by refusing to hold a hearing and dismissing my filings without review. This is a direct violation of constitutional rights, parental rights, and due process protections guaranteed under both state and federal law.
 
Opinion on Why the Defect Is Ignored
 
In my opinion, the reason why the courts and state agencies do not want to fix this defect is because correcting it would mean that all orders from the past seven years are void. That includes custody orders, child support orders, sanctions, and enforcement actions — all of which were issued without a valid adjudication of paternity. Acknowledging this would expose judges, clerks, attorneys, and state officials to liability for knowingly enforcing orders that were legally void from the start. Rather than face accountability, they continue to ignore the truth and protect each other.
 
CourtAbuse.org exposes these violations and demands accountability from the courts, clerks, state agencies, and federal judges who have upheld void orders while violating due process and parental rights.

bottom of page